Archive for the 'Europe INNOVA' Category

mClusters conference in Tallinn, Estonia, 6-7 December 2007

Monday, January 14th, 2008

Tallinn Region – ”the European e-region”

Tallinn has been the European lead region in reorganising the public sector through the use of new e-technologies for collaboration between the public sector and private enterprises, thereby enhancing the offerings for citizens in the Tallinn region and in Estonia as a whole. The first IT strategy was implemented in 1994 on the basis of a very positive attitude of both the population and the government to implement new e-technologies and this attitude is unchanged and has allowed to convert Estonia in the leading e-technology country in Europe.

Hannes Astok, member of the Estonian parliament and former program director of the Estonian e-governance academy, and Vaino Olev, Tallinn City IT director, underlined the importance  of the e-governance program to facilitate the communication between citizens and the Estonian administration. Several initiatives have been conducted during the last years to enable electronic transactions in all areas of public life.

e-Governance Academy

The Estonoan government has early on realised the importance of an e-Governance Academy (eGA) to develop the strategy for the country’s IT infrastructure. The eGA is a non-profit organisation for the creation and transfer of knowledge concerning e-governance, with a special emphasis on tools for developing democracy and civil society. The main activities consist of research & analysis, training and consultancy and many of the Estonian successes have had their roots in the e-governance academy activities.

Success Factors for the Estonian “e-Hype”

According to Hannes Astok the following five success factors were key to the successful transformation of the region into an e-technologies region and thus serving as a best practice to other European regions:

• good level of education and research
• relatively young ICT systems
• Finnish, Swedish and German influence
• good telecom infrastructures and high level of eBanking
• flexibility of a small country

e-Estonia Facts and Figures

• 62 % of population are Internet users.
• 42 % of the households have a computer, 82 % of home computers are connected to the Internet.
• over 700 Public Internet Access Points in Estonia, 51 per 100 000 people
• more than 1 079 000 smart-card type ID-cards issued (all populaton 1.34m)
• 86% of tax  declarations were e-declarations (2006), increased by 12% compared to 2005
• 1st place in Internet Banking – (next are  Norway, Nederlands, New Zealand….)

The digital infrastructure is part of a wider strategy to transform Estonia into the leading “digital society” in Europe, focusing the resources in the country on how to develop applications and use the existing infrastructure to create a leading environment of high-technology companies to prosper in an area with a high engagement of the public sector and citizens as lead-markets.

e-Voting and e-Payments with the National Identity Card

Now the goals of the ongoing e-government strategy are based on a
customer- centric orientation (bottom up) to achieve an efficient and transparent public sector. The government wants to foster the integration of the Estonian population in democratic participation and therefore has been a European pioneer for e-voting based on a functioning model for protection of personal data.

E-voting is based on the introduction of a smart national identity card introduced already in 2002 and now equipped with a RSA crypto chip to allow for two private keys – enabling authentification and digital signatures. Over 1 million smard ID cards  have been issued by January 2007 (~ 90% of 15 to 74-year-old persons) including 230.000 ID-cards for foreigners.
A certification centre has been created at national level as a private limited company entity to contract with the government for the certification of the national ID-card and to develop the required electronic infrastructure and software. The company is held by a consortium of banking institutes and telecom operators.

Now e-voting has first been used by a public opinion poll in Tallinn in March 2005, thereafter in the local elections in October 2005 with about 2% uptake (9317 persons using e-voting). In March 2007 the Estonian parliament elections received a usage uptake of 5,5% (32 275 citizens) and it is planned to expand on e-voting for both the EU parliament elections in June 2009 and the next local elections in 2009.

Central Register and Data Exchange between Registers – X-Road

For 2008 and 2009 the Estonian government plans to complete the introduction of a central information repository to avoid citizen data redundancy and incorrect or not updated information. The aim is to conduct a vertical (state – local) and horizontal in-house IT systems integration, the project being named x-road. The Estonian citizens will no longer be required to deliver personal information to various administrations, but will only communicate relevant information once. All administration entities will  then be able and required (legal obligation) to retrieve relevant personal data from the central registry. The citizens can refuse to communicate personal information already delivered one time to an Estonian administration authority.

Tallinn e- or m-Technology Projects

Tallin has implemented several innovative projects that are running successfully based on the introduction of free Wireless Internet access: Tallinn has introduced more than 49 wireless Internet Connection HotSpots (WiFi) in the city’s most popular parks, squares and beaches (summer time only) entirely free of charge.

This infrastructure has enabled projects such as:

• M-parking (more than 60% of parking revenues in Tallinn come from mobile parking payments)
• ID-ticket in public transport  (virtual ticket, its users prove that hey have a pre-paid ticket with their mational identification cards, 100 000 ID-ticket daily users, 72,0 % of all passengers are ID-ticket users)
• e-School (communication of examination results via SMS, online lesson planning and communication etc.)

Further, more detailed information can be obtained upon request.
Implementation of  technology parks in Tallinn

The Tallinn-based Technopol park is an example of a successful PPP project to concentrate relevant know-how in a technology park development.

Tecnopol is located in the area of the former academy of sciences and is now aiming to  grow to challenge other European tecnoparks. Currently the park is hosting 135 companies (mostly innovative SME’s) on 10 acres of land. The industry sectors are divided between ICT, Biotec and materials sectors and the entire park is located next to the Tallinn technical university and IT college with approximately 12.500 persons (students and researchers). Tecnopol is also the home of the Skype research & development center and companies such as Cybernetica, concentrating on data security and mobile data transmission.

This is even more relevant as the Tallinn region (and Estonia) can be considered an excellent testbed to develop and test new innovative e- and m-solutions with an enthusiastic attitude of the local population and the Estonian government.

European clusters should start to consider Estonia as the key region for testing new applications as there are very few legal or attitude barriers in place, unlike in other European technology clusters.

Living Labs as Lead Markets

Sunday, November 12th, 2006

On 29-30 of June, we attended the thematic workshop of Europe INNOVA in Munich ‘Lead Markets and Innovation’. Raised by the Aho Group Report ‘’Creating an innovative Europe'’ into how the Lisbon objectives can be achieved, Lead Markets are widely discussed as an instrument to promote European competitiveness through local excellence, competitiveness and lead-user availabilities as catalysts for globally competitive products and solutions.

Particular issues raised by the workshop included European policy on innovation (David White, Director Innovation Policy EC DG Enterprise), which is yet to define a position towards lead markets as a growth instrument. It is a hotly debated topic inside the European Commission, and Prof Luke Geroghiu as member of the Aho group summarised the context in which the lead market was raised as a policy issue.

Living Labs Europe incorporates an advanced concept of lead markets, primarily through the integration of end-users into the innovation process, as well as the trans-European networking of markets and user-needs to serve innovation, attractiveness and economic development. Whilst each Living Lab is a local lead market for a prioritised set of solution areas, Living Labs Europe itself acts as a pan-European lead market.

A core set of factors were discussed that make lead markets, such as mobile ICT in the Baltic Sea Region, automotive and photo-voltaics in Germany, particularly competitive – attracting inward investments and setting global standards. Lead markets may best be identified by features such as competitive market structures, cost advantages, advanced demand structures, global transfer structures via participating Multi-National Corporations (MNC), and export advantages partly also due to advanced secondary services attuned with the specificity of the sector. Yet, it appears a challenge to accurately predict lead markets – as most are identified after they have developed.

mWatch methodologies, consisting of a mixture of indicators (Mobile Fluency, Innovative Climate, Management Capacity) go a long way to capture the localised Mobile Readiness. Demand and lead-users are identified, together with technical competences, the ability to innovate as well as the capacity to manage and lead horizontal projects. The Kaleidoscope of Innovative Projects showcases the leading projects and entrepreneurs exploiting or even surpassing the framework conditions – recognising the entrepreneurial and innovative spirit. mWatch intends to provide insights into emerging lead markets – as can be said about the top performing Estonia. Whether this lead market will be able to deliver the exportable goods, set international standards or even just sustain its position will remain to be seen.

Extensive discussions focused on standards and regulatory instruments to shape lead markets – not only through de-regulation, but by setting ambitious lead-targets (i.e. Germany’s renewable energy tariff; Japanese Top-Runner programme) that set internationally competitive performance and quality standards. Knut Blind, from ISI Fraunhofer, provided intriguing insights into the spectrum of instruments at the disposal of not only regulators, but also companies and shared standardisation platforms. Living Labs may consider direct end-user involvement in creation of standards – in mobile ICT with its acceptance challenges as a key hurdle to open markets. These may not only set the accessibility, but also the security / privacy of services provided as is shown by the concerns of the mStudent communities.

Whilst often a national competence, local governments in Living Labs Europe have already shown that particularly public procurement can act as an important standard-setting instrument. Hamburg is reviewing its urban furniture / outdoor advertising licensing to set a new standard via insisting on interactive functionality by the bidding firms. For providers, that may include globally operating urban furniture / outdoor advertising firms like JC Decaux, Wall AG and others, Living Lab Hamburg may become the de-facto benchmark with continuing high demands on service provision that will set standards elsewhere calling opening export opportunities for unique competences.

Experts reviewed the role of procurement as a critical issue in shaping lead markets, outlining the need to consider innovation and potential fostering of lead markets as part of specification, tendering and delivery processes. Competitive Dialogue, whilst only accepted as an exception to procurement rules, opens a channel to review technological possibilities with possible providers before finalising specifications. This, combined with directives explicitly excluding R&D activities from common procurement restrictions, may bear significant opportunities to make Living Labs more competitive as local and networked lead markets and enable more co-investment via true PPP.

Whether or not lead markets will feature as a strategic component in European innovation policy, it is clear that Living Labs Europe is set to achieve a networked market that may overcome also the issue of cross-border viability of lead market solutions. Already today, early steps are undertaken in the network with particular need to strengthen the advanced demand side and commitment by policy-makers to strategically procure and invest in innovative solutions. Unlike the eco- or space-technology sectors, Living Labs actively shape user-communities and their demands from a legitimised platform – that span not across a non-homogenous national market, but across a community of interested users and leaders across Europe.

Living Labs Forum 2006

Sunday, November 12th, 2006

Living Labs Forum 2006 brought together Living Lab leaders from 12 European cities, as well as business executives, methodology experts and policy makers. Held in Barcelona, the event covered experiences, emerging projects, results and opportunities and lead to a rich exchange between those that are bringing new advanced mobility services to Europes citizens, businesses and visitors.

After three-and-a-half days of extensive presentations, discussions exchanges and intensive networking, the Living Labs Europe Forum 2006 came to a close on Wednesday in Barcelona.

  Harald Hjalmarsson Monica Mateu

Our days in Barcelona, supported by the mClusters community and our local Living Labs Catalunya partners, was attended by leaders of more than 12 Living Labs and mClusters – representing local / regional and trans-national public agencies, leading universities, small- and medium-sized companies and multi-national corporations. Co-located with the Internet Global Congress , the event was held in an entrepreneurial context with more than 3.000 ICT professionals and their show-cases around us.

A broad spectrum of issues was reviewed, with experts or leaders in each field facilitating the discussion. Professor Jan Annerstedt of Living Labs Europe kicked off the sessions with giving the stage to the European dimension of Living Labs.

Angelos Ktenas and Marika Kaliff reviewed the current state and considerations of European policy on Living Labs, introducing their departmental and directorate (DG Information Society and Media) objectives. Reflecting on the key policy and funding frameworks provided via i2010 and CIP (Competitiveness Innovation Programme) progress on development of eWork Living Labs was reported. Marika Kaliff outlined the work on the initial work done today in the definition of Living Labs concepts and how these can integrate into EU policy frameworks.

Pelle Ehn, Professor at K3, the School of Arts and Communication at Malmo University and internationally recognised expert on participatory innovation and design followed the EU policy perspective by placing Living Labs into a historical context reaching into the early and mid 20th century and placing Living Labs into a line of models and experiments in linking technology and solution design methods. Prof Ehn outlined both the limitations faced by traditional participatory design as well as the emerging instruments that can be used as components in advanced Living Labs – including the ecologies of artefacts that conceive technology development of an appropriation and integration of habitual environments. Drawing our attention to design not as a limited stage, but also an activity that can span into the post-design stages of training, appropriation and socialising efforts Professor Ehn also pointed at the significant disciplinary implications on design as a more holistic process reaching beyond the conception and production stages.

A key concern was raised by the floor, focusing in particular in the motivational challenges in Living Labs – an issue later reflected also during the methodology workshop run by Prof Ehn. Living Labs leaders often face barriers of motivation or prioritisation to bring about cross-sectoral or just inter-departmental change. Motivating limited user groups in a hospital or similar environment may be only one component of mobilising a broader stakeholder community into participatory design.

Herein, according to Ehn, lies both a great challenge and opportunity. Mass participation, in which more than 2000 users can take part are possible and practiced most widely in the practice of architecture and urbanism. Defining the territory of engagement and scaling-up methodologies may be a new field of opportunity due to the territorial make-up and anchoring of Living Labs to particularities of ‘place’.

Angelos Ktenas reflected also on the EU Policy side, which offers the programmatic frameworks to address motivational issues, yet offer no instruments or special attentions at this stage to this aspect of Living Labs operations. It appears to emerge that reporting the experiences gathered in the Living Labs Europe community may be a particularly important contribution to support the ‘triggering of engagement’ (Annerstedt) that could be fed into the FP7 Living Labs framework. These conceptual and policy framework discussions were followed by the entrepreneur’s perspective on Living Labs.

Anders Halldin, CEO of Woize International (a VoIP operator) outlined his company’s strategy in utilising Living Labs Europe as an instrument to innovate in direct collaboration with end-user communities across Europe. Living Labs, according to Halldin, continue to add significant elements of differentiation to Woize’s business development and solution portfolio, which is integrated into municipal messaging platforms, provides free telephony, SMS / wireless commercial transactions and brandspace to local and international networks. Woize already collaborates with Living Labs in Sweden, Germany and Catalunya via Living Labs Europe to go beyond test-bed functionality by proactively shaping user-demand. Like all other speakers on the panel, it was made clear that test-beds are only a component of a Living Lab – with the broader challenge lying in the organisational and leadership implications.

Leadership, unsurprisingly, featured as a key success factor in the exchange of experiences from Living Labs that was presented by representatives from Vaestervik, Kalmar region in Sweden, and in Hamburg.

Hakan Brynielsson, Managing Director of the Kalmar County launched the second session with an introduction into the digital society development in Kalmar. Already in the mid-late nineties plans were developed to implement a regional roll-out of broadband services going in conjunction with dramatic reorganisations in the public sector. A significant enabler for the successful (mainly infrastructural) investments in Kalmar was a leadership ability to consolidate fragmented investment funds for 12 municipalities in the region to establish and implement a regional strategy.

Picking up on the regional framework, Harald Hjalmarsson, Mayor of Vaestervik (37.000 inhabitants) placed this development into a context of the municipal trauma when Electrolux transferred 1.000 jobs from Vaestervik to Hungary.

Instead of striking or fighting the inevitable, public leaders took a bold decision to address the future head-on. Setting in motion the Living Lab Vaestervik not only advanced technologies but conepts for rationalising and rethinking public administration has made Vaestervik an international reference for mobile solution development. mTourism, mStudent, mCitizen are the priority areas in which advanced concepts have become realities. Over the past year, leaders from other Living Labs have visited Vaestervik and international collaborations have been triggered by Living Labs Europe.

Following this local success story of a small community (which included also representation by the winners of the mStudent contest and the headmaster), the City of Hamburg and its stakeholders presented a spectacular view of its Living Lab. Jens Bley (Living Labs Germany) presented the ‘Mobile Marketing in Urban Spaces’ concept, which draws on a synthesis of traditional and mobile media and marketing channels into a holistic urban information space. Combining research findings by Simon Blake from Berlin and extensive media experience in Hamburg, this concept is a concept for Europe with already key stakeholders aligned from the business and public sector community in Hamburg. Exploitation of holistic licensing fees can effectively quadruple licensing revenues for the City of Hamburg in tendering an interactive outdoors advertising and urban furniture package in 2008 – a triggering event in what is anticipated to be a European roll-out.

Whilst presented as a sound business proposition, the concept addresses also important informational and navigational needs by citizens and the objectives of municipalities to promote mGovernance services. The project drives a network of partners in Hamburg as well as a European consortium of Living Labs partners in Catalunya, Sweden and Budapest seeking to commence Market Validation in the coming months.

Uwe-Jens Neumann, Managing Director of Hamburg’s Economic Promotion Agency, provided the municipal perspective and leadership strategy behind the Hamburg Living Lab. Anchored within the professional network http://www.hamburg-media.net/ (2300 members), established already for 10 years, with experiences in being the first European municipality to roll out sponsored WiFi coverage in the city-centre. As a Living Lab, Hamburg will draw on these unique infrastructures and the expertise inherent in Germany’s leading hub for media businesses. Complementing the mobile marketing (and related) projects, networking events (“Living Labs Lounge”) provide the social environment in which ideas, collaboration opportunities and inspirations are exchanged.

In the questions raised to the panel, important issues relating to the various forms of Public-Private-Partnerships in Living Labs were raised to the representatives from Vaestervik, Kalmar and Hamburg. The separation between commercial and public interest remains a challenge, as the innovations intended require close collaboration and forward-looking co-investment. If these were to be followed by extensive tendering procedures it would disrupt the private sector willingness to invest – yet it is also the public interest that calls for transparent decision making in such processes. Harald Bynielsson confirmed this concern – as a day-to-day challenge without simple recipes.

Yet, it was a comment by Mr Hjalmarsson that set clear the ambition by the Mayor of Vaestervik as challenging preconceptions on municipal services. H e expressed his goal to bring a large percentage of tax-payers money onto their mobile device to give them greater freedom in selecting public services.

A round-table facilitated by Pelle Ehn addressed Living Labs Methodology in response to the cases and experienced expressed. Whilst test-beds presume a service to exist, a Living Lab project shapes demand in close collaboration with the end-user. Ideally this is followed by a strong user-participation in the design process – an aspect that he felt was yet to be fully achieved in the experiences to date.

Living Labs Europe Stand Nancy Marek (SAP Labs France) Sascha Haselmayer, Christer Asplund

In Vaestervik and Hamburg, the involvement of end-users in the design could generate unforeseen results that should also draw on ethnographies – to follow, ask and search in a non-linear process. Electrolux has made significant recoveries when it began to integrate social probing, prototyping and user participation into a new design process. Tobi Schneidler, of M.A.O. Works (London) introduced the promising practice (and now industry) of experience modelling – as a service design industry – of which components could be used to enrich Living Labs processes. Experiences from

Living Lab Sant Cugat confirmed the prototyping methods, where simple technologies (SMS) were deployed – yet it was the internal operational structures that continued to prove most challenging.

Pelle Ehn outlined a significant methodological advancement that Living Labs could contribute to participatory design. Living Labs establish longer-term communities of collaboration that last beyond the projects. If this is to be achieved, community building ought to be integrated into the process of establishing Living Labs – as has been done in various regions. This in combination with larger scale user participation (2000+) could lead to new forms of design, unpredictable results and a truly unique Living Labs offering.

Sascha Haselmayer, of Living Labs Europe and Coordinator of Living Labs Catalunya introduced the progress made in Catalunya - including the implementation of the branding efforts through prioritised project lines. International networks have been launched to structure collaborative projects along the lines of mStudent, mTourism, mVisitor, and mMarketing connecting companies, public agencies and research groups with their international counterparts.

Christer Asplund, of Living Labs Europe, hosted the sessions on reporting the results of the mWatch Europe studies findings on Mobile Readiness in Europe. 25 Cities were reviewed, leading to a number of rankings according to the Mobile Readiness Index.

Complementing the index, a review of Kaleidoscope cases for the most innovative projects and regional conditions took place, with presentations from 11 European regions. Overall, findings of more than 80 innovative mobile projects were presented in a round-table atmosphere triggering an exchange of experiences, opportunities and even investor interest.

Tuesday kicked-off with a spectacular presentation on ‘Mobile Marketing in Urban Spaces’ by Simon Blake and Jens Bley (Living Labs Germany). Covering the detailed concept (including demonstrations and prototypes) the presentation triggered a lively discussion of limitations and opportunities in Europe. A key factor, in some regions, may be the regulation of public vs private contents – yet overall the added-value of a European vision for such a concept was recognised. In particular, its convergence of various existing components already operational in various Living Labs – integrating also free telephony and Bluetooth services – helped to bring the level of technical feasibility to trigger discussions about market validation.

Simon Blake Living Labs Germany - Mobile Marketing in Urban Spaces Simon Blake 

A roundtable on mTourism chaired by Christer Asplund reviewed the current initiatives in the regions present, plus an international comparison with offerings in Asia and the United States. Whilst many services are already available in Estonia, these do not sufficiently seem to integrate with traditional (including outdoor-advertising) media to build awareness. Tourists / Visitors are not informed about the great variety of services, including the ringing of church-bells via SMS in Tarttu. Arturo Ortega, of the Barcelona Living Lab ( Fundacion Barcelona Digital) showed confidence in achieving the objectives established in the Brand Manual for Living Labs Catalunya in relation to the 2007 3GSM World Congress which should serve as a showcase for new content and visitor services in Catalunya. In addition, a pilot of the new 7010 mobile service for citizens (including city agenda, map, information) was presented that could act as a platform for further Living Lab services.

A particular highlight was the discussion of food clusters in various European regions to develop food related solutions. Interest from Sweden, Piedmonte, Catalunya, Oresund, Budapest, and Portugal was particularly strong to link unique traditions, expertise, logistics and products with advanced mobile services – such as recipes on demand, tour guides and others. A Food Living Lab is in the making in Grythyttan, with an international Living Lab event planned in October 2006 that could trigger European networking. Furthermore, linkages can actively be built with the Food networks in INNOVA and InvestorNet Food Group.In all, the roundtables and sessions produced an extensive overview in 3 days – which is only covered in small fragments in this article.